If we look into a newspaper or turn on the
television or the radio, we are presented with mega-conflicts that have been
hot for years and decades, if not for whole centuries. We are aware that only a
limited set of conflicts is thus being presented to us: that apart from the
“official”, CNN-compatible global issues there are in fact many more, which do
not make the headlines for lack of lobbying.
That is the large world of conflict; then
there is a smaller world made up of all the different areas of human life, in
which fights, envy, hate, etc., are nothing out of the ordinary. At times, when
one field of human interrelations seems in perfect harmony, a fight may
suddenly break out at another place; and if at one moment all seems placid and
peaceful, the next may bring an explosion scattering things in all directions.
Inner life is hardly different. One time we
feel good and in tune with ourselves, at another a fight will break out within
and we will tense up or suffer physically or emotionally. We will quarrel with
a sore part of the body, a painful thought, unimplemented plans, or unsatisfied
needs.
What such experiences can show us is that
all these conflicts are connected and that one may intensify the other. Inner
indispositions tend to take their toll on relationships; tensed up
relationships may be disturbing to larger networks of relations; and these will
in turn influence mentalities and cultural patterns. Thus, there are
connections between a lot of things if not everything.
How
can we find peace when there is so much trouble in the world? Does that even
make any sense at all? Shouldn’t we instead rage against all this cruelty and
injustice? Wouldn’t it simply be hypocritical and ostrich-like to seek inner
peace while the world is sinking into chaos? Is that what you call peace,
sitting in your ivory tower, your castle in the sky, on your illusionary island
of the blessed? How can you still write poems after Auschwitz, Theodor W.
Adorno would ask.
Only
when we have established peace everywhere will there be peace in individual
cases, as the sceptic will have it. To quote once more Adorno: “Wrong life
cannot be lived rightly”. However, if nothing is right before all that is wrong has been gotten rid
of, we can hardly hope for the right life to come anytime soon. If we insist
that peace is possible only after all strife has ended, we will become obsessed
with an idée fixe. We will wait for absolute peace, for a perfect world to
come. We will act as if it were possible, if only at a much later date, and as
if nothing were possible before that time arrived.
Yet absolute peace is the offspring of
human thought, and it would be wrong to perceive it as some kind of entity for
us to behold one day. Instead, it should be sufficient to think of it as the
“regulative idea” of Immanuel Kant: something to aim at, something that will
not let us rest before we haven’t realized it.
We must not abandon or water down the idea
of eternal or absolute peace, but we should not misuse it either, by despairing
of progress. We might experience it as a kind of tension that does not paralyse
but strengthen us, encouraging us to move on: like a power that manifests
itself in the urge of the evolution of consciousness onwards.
We should try everything to again and again
connect with this power; it is the power of life itself that wants to lead us
onwards. It is down to us to create contact and cause exchange between this
flow of life and a particular point within the vast network, a place that we
take a very unique and personal approach to, as it is our own self. It is there
we can allow peace to spring forth and grow, so that it may expand and spread,
becoming tempting and infectious.
In the midst of trouble, as can be seen on
the photo, showing a cellist performing in Sarajewo’s city library, which has
been wrecked by bombing. He represents what no war can destroy: the vibration
and spirit of humanity in sweet harmony with eternity and the beauty of the
Great Beyond. This kind of peace is gentle and soft, easily drowned out by
clamour and fearful confusion yet consistent and indestructible, being seated
deep down below all that which can be troubled.
(Translation Michael Ehrmann)
(Translation Michael Ehrmann)
Thank you. I needed this right now.
ReplyDelete